1) please explain how Wendy McElroy builds a positive “pro pornography” case? What do you think of her strategy? Do you think there are any worries/difficulties that McElroy’s project faces? If so, what are they and how might McElroy respond to those worries/difficulties?
2) please comment on the following moral principle put forward in Singer’s article…
“If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it…”
Do you think this principle is true and ought to be accepted? Or do you think the principle is false and ought to be rejected? Discuss and explain why or why not?